On 12/30/2009 12:17 AM, Martijn Faassen wrote:
Hey,
Marius Gedminas wrote:
So, what's the way forward for existing Zope 3.4 (KGS) users?
Rewrite our apps so we don't depend on anything in zope.app and switch to the ZTK?
That's not possible as far as I can see, as the Zope 3.4 KGS doesn't support this. No zope.container yet, for instance, so no way to get rid of zope.app.container. It's only possible to start such an app rewrite once you're on the ZTK. (we don't know whether it's possible to complete such a rewrite. we will have to see)
Band together and release a Zope 3.5 KGS, which would be a strict superset of the ZTK 1.0?
Band together and release a ZopeApp 1.0 KGS which would be a strict superset of the ZTK 1.0?
Yes. Possibly a Zope 3.5 KGS that extends that further, I'm not sure.
(In which case, why not call it Zope 3.5 KGS?)
Because Grok can use the ZopeApp 1.0 KGS as well. So can Zope 2 users who need to upgrade away from zope.app packages. (I think!)
Forget all this open-source sharing stuff and maintain our own separate versions.cfg files with ad-hoc version mixes?
I'm trying to remember this open source sharing stuff and avoid ad-hoc version mixes where we can.
Personally, I'd prefer option 1 (if there were docs to tell me what to do to get rid of zope.app, which is implausible) or option 2.
I prefer option 3 (ZopeApp KGS), because there's a greater opportunity for that old open source sharing thing. And also because it would help us get rid of the somewhat confusing "Zope 3" terminology.
Hmm. Just because I've been lagging and do get some newcomer questions here and there: is there an overview of what KGSs exist and what they "mean"? Christian -- Christian Theune · ct@gocept.com gocept gmbh & co. kg · forsterstraße 29 · 06112 halle (saale) · germany http://gocept.com · tel +49 345 1229889 0 · fax +49 345 1229889 1 Zope and Plone consulting and development