4 Dec
2001
4 Dec
'01
6:31 p.m.
Phillip J. Eby wrote:
P.S. Speaking of naming, I still dislike "feature" as a term for interface implementations; various suggestions available on the "Feature" page of the ComponentArchitecture Wiki. :)
I agree. I still much prefer 'adaptor' and I don't buy the 'adaptors sound too much like a light-weight layer' argument. If people agree, I will go through the Zope 3 CVS and change all references from Feature to Adaptor. :) Regards, Martijn