23 May
2009
23 May
'09
10:36 p.m.
Marius Gedminas wrote:
On Sat, May 23, 2009 at 08:59:34PM +0200, Martijn Faassen wrote:
What about simply calling it zope.view? (I don't like the plural in package names either generally)
FWIW at some point I decided that singular is appropriate when a package defines a concept, and plural is appropriate when a package provides multiple implementations of that concept.
Thus you have zope.interface but zope.$anything.interfaces.
In this case it's a plural of metaconfiguration. Maybe "zope.viewzcml"? I think that would express the intent even better. Shane