Hi, Suppose I have an interface IDerived that's derived from an interface IBase, overriding a field from it.
from zope.interface import Interface from zope.schema import TextLine
class IBase(Interface): ... a = TextLine(title=u"a") ... b = TextLine(title=u"b") ... c = TextLine(title=u"c")
class IDerived(IBase): ... b = TextLine(title=u"b", default=u"B")
In this case, the field ordering of zope.schema means that I'll get something like this:
from zope.schema import getFieldNamesInOrder getFieldNamesInOrder(IDerived) ['a', 'c', 'b']
I had rather expected the order to be ['a', 'b', 'c']. That is, I would expect a field that overrides a field from a base interface, to retain the base interface's order. One way to fix this is to do:
IDerived['b'].order = IBase['b'].order
Now both will have the same order, of course. So, I'm wondering: - Is it harmful to have two fields with the same order like this when they share a name? - Should this be the default behavior when deriving interfaces from one another like this? If the latter is desirable, I'd be willing to help find a way to implement it. The field order is just an ever-increasing int that's set in Field.__init__(), so we'd probably need some after-the-fact fixing up of fields. One way to do that would be to fire an event at the end of InterfaceClass.__init__() and have an event handler to fix the order, though that'd make zope.interface dependent on zope.event which is probably not desirable. We could simulate the event handler in another way, of course, e.g. by having the interface initialiser loop over its attributes and see if they support e.g. an IOrderAware interface and call a method on it, and have Field implement this. What do you think? Martin