Jim Fulton wrote:
Lennart Regebro wrote:
From: "Jim Fulton" <jim@zope.com>
Initially, I propose to move just the repository heads. Maintenamce branches (e.g. Zope 2.6 and Zope 2.7) will remain in CVS.
What is the rationale behind not moving it all?
- Reduce risk
- Provide a more gradual transition
Dunno if this got covered on IRC, but could you try migrating the whole repository (branches, tags et al) into SVN, but making it clear that if you want ot patch anything prior to HEAD, you need to do so in CVS. Maybe then Kapil's scripts could be used to keep the SVN in synch with the master repository until such time as there are no further 2.7 releases? (I'll put money on their not being another 2.6 release anyway ;-) Chris -- Simplistix - Content Management, Zope & Python Consulting - http://www.simplistix.co.uk