5 May
2003
5 May
'03
6:56 p.m.
Hi Magnus! Magnus Heino wrote:
Implementing the OrderedObjectManager proposal, we fleshed it out and modified it a bit. I made an initial checkin on a branch which reflects our current thinking. So this is your chance to discuss the changes before we merge it into the trunk.
I would rather see OrderedObjectManager not being a container/folder. It should be a type that you can add, configure from where to get ids, and a way to order and/or sort.
You mean an object of that type should be placed inside the container?
That would be much more flexible, and not depend on the implementation of the actual folder.
It's a bit late to bring that up. The proposal was OK'ed months ago. Cheers, Yuppie