On 29.04.2009 16:51 Uhr, Lennart Regebro wrote:
On Wed, Apr 29, 2009 at 16:09, Andreas Jung <lists@zopyx.com> wrote:
On 29.04.2009 15:28 Uhr, Chris Withers wrote:
Hanno Schlichting wrote:
Chris Withers wrote:
I'm also about -sys.maxint on these changes for Zope 2.12 as I'd like to see 2.12 out the door as soon as possible.
Then we have a conflict of interest. My main goal for Zope 2.12 is to be based on the Zope Toolkit 1.0 release and loose quite some more stuff.
My understanding is that the big drive for Zope 2.12 was to get it egg-based. That is now done, so lets get it out the door.
I think Zope 2.13 would be an excellent target for moving to ZTK 1.0. There's no reason Zope 2.13 shouldn't follow as quickly after 2.12 as it is able, but I also see no reason to hold up 2.12 waiting for something which has no defined end point.
I strongly object inflationary Zope 2 releases.
Well, this isn't inflationary, is it? 2.12 is eggified. That deserves a new version number. If we then after that start changing how acquisition work, that also needs a new version number.
We would have to maintain four different major release of Zope: 2.10, 2.11, 2.12 and 2.13. Support for 2.10 can't be dropped since it is the requirement for Plone 3.X. A new major Zope 2.13 can be addressed when there are enough valuable features and changes that satisfy a new release. Andreas -- ZOPYX Ltd. & Co. KG - Charlottenstr. 37/1 - 72070 Tübingen - Germany Web: www.zopyx.com - Email: info@zopyx.com - Phone +49 - 7071 - 793376 Registergericht: Amtsgericht Stuttgart, Handelsregister A 381535 Geschäftsführer/Gesellschafter: ZOPYX Limited, Birmingham, UK ------------------------------------------------------------------------ E-Publishing, Python, Zope & Plone development, Consulting