Martins answer doens't seem to have arrived here, so sorry for the weird quoting:
On 21 Apr 2008, at 11:53 , Martin Aspeli wrote:
Does it really matter whether a microsite lives in zope.org/projects/zodb or zodb.zope.org?
As mentioned, no.But it's important that it is it's own site, running it's own version of the software, so that it can be maintained seperately without having to upgrade all of zope.org.
I agree with Martin. We need to stop the balkanization of Zope-the-brand. Yes, we have many individual projects, but we need a coherent image to the outside world. Microsites was a good idea to get foundation site and the Grok site up and running *before* tackling zope.org, but in the long run, we need coherence.
Also, to be honest, I don't find the design of the new Grok website very attractive. And the foundation site is simple enough to be folded back into the main site.
I understand these points, but I repeat one last time: Zope.org has been in dire need of upgrade for more than five years. It got one in the beginning of this, and that produced a zope.org that wasn't very much better, and since then, nothing happened. The main reason for failure is that it is a monolithic gigant. Don't make that mistake again. Please. -- Lennart Regebro: Zope and Plone consulting. http://www.colliberty.com/ +33 661 58 14 64