18 May
2000
18 May
'00
4:45 p.m.
Well, that sort of makes sense. The containing object is the object that needs to be updated to rid itself of the reference to the contained object. I'm not sure I understand the problem. The object to be updated *is* the container.
My problem is the first step: how does the client recognize, which object has to be updated? In the case of a creation and deletion of an object, the transaction-class handles the parent object and not the object itself.
-- Chris McDonough Digital Creations Publishers of Zope - http://www.zope.org