Hi all
Betreff: Re: [Zope-dev] Zope.pipeline proposal
Hey,
Tres Seaver wrote: [snip]
In general, if you need full-on backward compatibility with the existing behavior of Zope2 / Zope3 / Grok, switching to a paste-driven WSGI pipeline doesn't gain you much speed (but it is not a loss, either). If, for a given application, you can relax the BBB requirement, then some performance wins are available via WSGI which can't be made in the monolithic publisher (dropping out features by removing the middleware layer).
As for Grok I hope we can break some backwards compatibility and get some larger performance speedups. We definitely need to aggressively keep moving forward in this area. Not even primarily for speed gains but also for comprehensibility; I find Chris's "what's it doing" report far more worrying than differences in speed at this point:
http://plope.com/whatsitdoing2
This is why zope.pipeline is such an important effort to me. Not that it will immediately make things better, but it would hopefully open up a path to move the Zope Framework forward in this area.
I absolutly agree! As far as I can see, the repoze sample doesn't open a ZODB which makes it not really comparable. Regards Roger Ineichen