Am 19.04.2011 um 15:29 schrieb Jim Fulton:
On Tue, Apr 19, 2011 at 9:23 AM, Jens Vagelpohl <jens@dataflake.org> wrote:
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1
On 4/19/11 15:19 , Jim Fulton wrote:
On Tue, Apr 19, 2011 at 3:39 AM, Jens Vagelpohl <jens@dataflake.org> wrote:
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1
On 4/19/11 08:52 , Michael Howitz wrote:
Hello,
while making projects in SVN complying to the repository policy I found files which tell that their license is "Zope Visible Source License, Version 1.0 (ZVSL)". Is this license a valid license in the zope.org repository? If not I'd like to merge the following change in zope.repositorypolicy: http://svn.zope.org/?rev=121436&view=rev +1
The ZVSL is a Zope Corporation-specific license that does not meet the requirements for projects hosted by the Zope Foundation. I am surprised you found any files with that license. Those should be in Zope Corporation-owned repositories, or they should be relicensed if ZC agrees.
Sorry our (probably my) bad. Those should have been fixed when we moved them from our repo to the zope.org repo.
Does the patch fix the files? Or just list them?
Hi Jim,
It just lists them as part of the weekly repository policy check that flows into the automated test summary email.
OK. I normally don't read that mail. I'll check in a week or so and if I see the list, I'll clean them up.
I merged the branch to the trunk so, the next run of the of the weekly repository policy check should show the affected packages. Yours sincerely, -- Michael Howitz · mh@gocept.com · software developer gocept gmbh & co. kg · forsterstraße 29 · 06112 halle (saale) · germany http://gocept.com · tel +49 345 1229889 8 · fax +49 345 1229889 1 Zope and Plone consulting and development