Martijn Faassen wrote:
Hey,
Okay, in the interests of making this discussion go quickly, there has been enough negative feedback about renaming Zope 2 to think we have no realistic chance of renaming it.
We are still stuck with the following perceived sequence:
Zope 2, Zope 3
which implies that people should want to upgrade.
Does it? There's precedence for systems where n and n+1 does not represent a linear upgrade path. The '3' says more "if you're starting afresh, this is where you want to start". I think that's still a correct statement.
If we don't call Zope Framework "4.0", we'll be fine. We should call its first release 1.0 and there's no implication of a progression.
Yes. For the love of God, please don't call "the Zope Framework" 4.0! Martin -- Author of `Professional Plone Development`, a book for developers who want to work with Plone. See http://martinaspeli.net/plone-book