On Thu, Mar 4, 2010 at 11:34 AM, Brian Sutherland <brian@vanguardistas.net> wrote:
On Thu, Mar 04, 2010 at 11:19:52AM -0500, Benji York wrote:
On Thu, Mar 4, 2010 at 11:09 AM, Brian Sutherland <brian@vanguardistas.net> wrote:
On Thu, Mar 04, 2010 at 10:09:26AM -0500, Jim Fulton wrote:
In the specific case of zope.event, I'd prefer it stay separate. I want developers to be able to publish events without having to commit to a subscription mechanism. For example, ZODB depends on zope.event so it can generate events and provide a generic hook mechanism. I don't want it to depend on zope.component.
I just committed a jinty-optional-event branch for zope.component that's an experiment as to how to make the dependency on zope.event optional.
Maybe I'm missing something, but zope.event is so minimal I can't see that making optional is worth the effort.
Actually, I misunderstood your question.
Good, because while reading you're response I was so confused I worried that I had recently had a stroke and not realized it yet. -- Benji York