Dieter Maurer wrote:
Stefane Fermigier writes:
It seems to me that when I create a CatalogAware objet in a version, it doesn't get into the catalog after the version is committed (in fact, it doesn't event get into the catalog inside the version).=20
Am I right? Is this considered normal behavio(u)r? Any idea for a workaro= und? I do not know, but I would be happy if it is this way...
Otherwise, any change in a version would look the catalog into this version. No two versions could work in parallel, as all would need the catalog.
But I fear, that precisely that will happen....
In my applications, I make heavy use of versions but not yet essential use of CatalogAware. This starts to change with the CMF as it uses corresponding methods to keep the catalog updated.
Dieter
Maybe, the problem I got in CMF after customizing the "discussion_reply_form" in a version are related to that (I posted a message to the CMF list yesterday, no answers yet though). I got a "NotFound" error, when replying to a document. Usually one gets the failing URL in the trace as well, which was not the case here (it was empty). Nevertheless the reply **was generated and added to the catalog and was searchable and viewable**. However, it was not generated as "document/talkback/8849776" as usual, but as (Portal is the root of the CMF site) "/Portal//talkback/8849776", with the two slashes after "Portal". And so didn't show up neither at the bottom of the document. So, is the moral: NO working within versions when changing (customizing) CMF sites (or other catalogaware objects ? Flynt