26 Apr
2005
26 Apr
'05
6:48 a.m.
On Apr 26, 2005, at 2:22, Florent Guillaume wrote:
Tim Peters <tim.peters@gmail.com> wrote:
Technical details of permanent failure: PERM_FAILURE: SMTP Error (state 9): 553 5.3.0 Spam blocked see: http://spamcop.net/bl.shtml?64.233.184.203
Yeah this goes to show that you have to be extremely careful in choosing your RBL sources... And that spamcop is definitely not a good one.
Not true. I've been using SpamCop for years now and had exactly four addresses that required me to create exceptions for them because their SMTP server got listed. I see what gets rejected because my Postfix sends me email about it, so I retain full control over the situation. jens