9 Mar
2010
9 Mar
'10
5:03 p.m.
On Tue, Mar 9, 2010 at 10:53 AM, Baiju M <mbaiju@zeomega.com> wrote:
Hi, Any idea how difficult it is to create optional C extensions for these packages:
zope.container zope.hookable zope.proxy zope.security
I believe it is very hard, if not impossible, for zope.proxy and zope.security. I suspect the best approach would be to make a new package (or set of packages) that provides everything that zope.security providex except the zope.security.proxy package. If I were going to do that though, I would rethink the way proxies and checkers are managed. Jim -- Jim Fulton