Dario Lopez-Kästen wrote:
Max M said the following on 2006-02-27 17:26:
Jim Fulton wrote:
2) In an alternate vision, Zope 2 evolves to Zope 5.
Zope 2 is complicated! It has too many layers of everything.
read the full sentence that Jim wrote:
2) In an alternate vision, Zope 2 evolves to Zope 5.
...
Note that Zope 5 will leverage Zope 3 technologies to allow a variety of configurations, including a Zope 2-like configuration with implicit acquisition and through-the-web development, and a Zope 3-like configuration that looks a lot like the current Zope 3 application server. Maybe, there will be a configuration that allows Zope 2 and Zope 3 applications to be combined to a significant degree.
In this scenario I cannot see how much of the old ways of zope2 remain (unless I have a totally unrealistic view of what Jim proposes). zope 2 or zop3 become an issue of configuring which "components"/parts to use.
But he also says: - Zope 3 doesn't have to reproduce all Zope 2 features. Which i fear could mean that the Zope 2 stack will hang in there for ever. I am pretty shure that is not what he meant meant to imply, I just wanted to make my view clear. -- hilsen/regards Max M, Denmark http://www.mxm.dk/ IT's Mad Science