Hi, On 04/09/2010 07:38 PM, Zvezdan Petkovic wrote:
On Apr 9, 2010, at 10:57 AM, Fred Drake wrote:
On Fri, Apr 9, 2010 at 10:43 AM, Tres Seaver<tseaver@palladion.com> wrote:
It seems reasonable to me that it *should* work, though I'm not sure how to write the code which tests that.
See my later follow-up as well.
In particular, while it *may* be reasonable to set the ZF as maintainer, it's not clear that it's the right thing either. Why shouldn't some "Grok Team" be listed as the maintainer for the grok packages, with an appropriate email? That seems preferable to me.
I think the *right* thing to do is update the copyrights to reflect the copyright ownership, but not to otherwise change package metadata.
Why was the check for author even included in the checker/fixer scripts? Can you point us to the Zope Foundation bylaws or a policy document that requires this?
I cannot find this in a contributor agreement.
Pondering it this is an overzealous misunderstanding on my part. I'm removing the assertion. Christian -- Christian Theune · ct@gocept.com gocept gmbh & co. kg · forsterstraße 29 · 06112 halle (saale) · germany http://gocept.com · tel +49 345 1229889 0 · fax +49 345 1229889 1 Zope and Plone consulting and development