13 May
2002
13 May
'02
2:16 p.m.
on 5/10/02 11:32 AM, Chris Withers at chrisw@nipltd.com scrivened:
Marc Lindahl wrote:
Don't you have that now with the kludgey 'not' construct?
What is kludgey about the 'not:' construct?!
For the reasons 'else' was invented in the first place, I guess: prone to errors, inefficient, bulky. The biggest thing I see is: isn't linked to the other construct, so it's prone to errors when editing the conditions.