9 Apr
2010
9 Apr
'10
2:57 p.m.
On Fri, Apr 9, 2010 at 10:43 AM, Tres Seaver <tseaver@palladion.com> wrote:
It seems reasonable to me that it *should* work, though I'm not sure how to write the code which tests that.
See my later follow-up as well. In particular, while it *may* be reasonable to set the ZF as maintainer, it's not clear that it's the right thing either. Why shouldn't some "Grok Team" be listed as the maintainer for the grok packages, with an appropriate email? That seems preferable to me. I think the *right* thing to do is update the copyrights to reflect the copyright ownership, but not to otherwise change package metadata. -Fred -- Fred L. Drake, Jr. <fdrake at gmail.com> "Chaos is the score upon which reality is written." --Henry Miller