I think using mxDateTime would be a great idea (it would mean DC would no longer need to maintain our own DateTime module). And since you've done a lot of good work in creating a wrapper, we've got a head start. But I think before it can go in to any release, we need to follow the fishbowl process. This means creating a proposal on dev.zope.org, letting Brian know about it, and then letting Brian choose if and when he wants it to go in (it will subsequently be made into a project). Thanks, - C Stephan Richter wrote:
At 10:28 AM 6/7/01 -0400, Chris McDonough wrote:
Actually, it's good that the license is BSDish, that means that it's legally possible to include mxDateTime inside a Zope distribution.
Cool, so the license problem is definitely solved.
Now, we just have to get rid of the last technical issues. From DC's point of view: Is there a chance, that this port to mxDateTime could make it into Zope 2.4? I think this would be the correct release in anyway, since there will be so many changes.
Regards, Stephan
-- Stephan Richter CBU - Physics and Chemistry Student Web2k - Web Design/Development & Technical Project Management