Stephan Richter wrote:
On Sunday 19 April 2009, Tres Seaver wrote:
-1. As a branding choice (as opposed to a technology), "Zope 3" *is* a dead-end: it implies a strategy (replacing Zope 2) which we no longer believe in. I think the consequences of the brand confusion are hard for those uf us "inside" to estimate, but they are far from trivial.
I never communicated to anyone that I believe that Zope 3 is a successor of Zope 2. Other people pushed that message.
It's not a message that needs pushing. In virtually every other piece of software ever created, when a version 3 comes out, it's meant to supersede version 2. No amount of navel-gazing is going to make that less confusing to people who are not happy to read the 40 messages of nuanced debate a day this list has produced lately. Martin -- Author of `Professional Plone Development`, a book for developers who want to work with Plone. See http://martinaspeli.net/plone-book