On Wed, Apr 23, 2008 at 10:57 PM, Martin Aspeli <optilude@gmx.net> wrote:
In the cases where projects (like Zope 3, Zope 2, CMF and ZODB) don't have their own sites, we give them space to maintain some documentation and basic information.
That story is better than the original formulation.
Exactly. Whch is very differnt from the previous idea of creating a fixed structure for all projects with documentation etc.
That was never the idea.
OK. It sounded like it.
I'm not terribly worried about upgrades. At least not now. The new zope.org site runs a very plain Plone instance. It has one purpose: to present some content. I don't want it littered with weird stuff that is hard to migrate or update.
It is true that the collector is no more, which helps. -- Lennart Regebro: Zope and Plone consulting. http://www.colliberty.com/ +33 661 58 14 64