On Mon, Aug 17, 2009 at 8:43 AM, Jim Fulton<jim@zope.com> wrote:
On Mon, Aug 17, 2009 at 8:38 AM, Stephan Richter<srichter@cosmos.phy.tufts.edu> wrote:
On Friday 14 August 2009, Jim Fulton wrote:
Thoughts?
Sounds good to me.
BTW, in my zopetoolkit dev branch, I've created a kgs directory to hold the ztk.cfg file and a ztk kgs buildout. If no one complains about this soon, I'll commit this to the trunk and this will become the official home of this info until we decide differently.
Why did you start using a new format for the KGS? I had written a lot of tools for zope.kgs that are very handy when it comes to actually creating releases and other things.
This is discussed in another thread.
Basically, it boils down to being simpler, less repetitive, and easier to work with.
BTW, I should have noted that the only tool I really care about is a tool that correctly runs the KGS tests, which we haven't had until now. - Runs each projects as a separate process to avoid test interference and to catch missing dependencies. - Uses the same project versions for all tests. Jim -- Jim Fulton