28 Mar
2011
28 Mar
'11
3:04 p.m.
Hello, * Sebastien Douche <sdouche@gmail.com> [2011-03-28 13:26]:
On Sat, Mar 26, 2011 at 15:18, Wolfgang Schnerring <ws@gocept.com> wrote:
An honest counter question: Why not use zope.testrunner? What advantages does py.test offer?
On the technical side, I don't know. But from my point of view, the most important thing is the "social" side. I'm a bit tired to be "compartmentalized" : you must use "generics" tools (Nose, WebOb, Paster...) or Zope tools (Zope3, KGS, zope.testbrowser, zope.testing, zc.buildout, z3c.testsetup...).
I'd like to clarify that I've asked the question not to exclude py.test, but on the opposite, to *include* it into consideration. So I think we're actually in agreement with each other. :-) Wolfgang