Hi, zope is exciting. Closely before becoming too enamoured, let me ask a newbie question (possibly FAQ) for clarification on this (obvious) snippet... LICENSE.txt
Zope Public License (ZPL) Version 1.0 -------------------------------------
Copyright (c) Digital Creations. All rights reserved.
This license has been certified as Open Source(tm).
(tm) - Uhh, well Open Source is not a trademark: "``Open Source'' is not and cannot become a trademark." Eric S. Raymond, President, President Board of Directors, OSI (OSI had previously applied for it) 16 June 1999 (http://www.opensource.org/press_releases/certified-open-source.html) But maybe this when LICENSE.txt was written in the dark ages where OSI still applied for that trademark, so perhaps it was intended to mean "certified by OSI" ? Or whom or what has been the certifier mentioned in the license (I feel not sure whether par. 5 would pass very strict criteria, but on the other hand par. 7 alleviates it) ? Again let me emphasize that I think Digital Creations is doing a really cool job; this is not necessarily political overcorrectness (but might be of some importance for the marketing guys if we go for it), just being curious, ;-) -- Holger Blasum 80336 Muenchen, Germany