-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Roger Ineichen wrote:
I decided after along night, trying to compile lxml on a windows box, that we will not use lxml and lxml based packages like z3c.form, z3c.template, z3c.macro etc at some of our windows servers.
Roger, I don't understand why you feel this way: there are perfectly usable binary eggs available for Windows, aren't there? I know that no Windows binaries are available yet for lxml 2.1.2, which has been out for all of 10 days, but they are available for 2.1.1.
We have to find a strategy to keep this packages free of lxml and implement the z3c.pt support in this packages in a different way.
- -1. There is not much point in z3c.pt at all without lxml, which is where the speed boost comes from.
I really like your lxml based z3c.pt work. It's nice and incredible fast.
It won't be fast if we rip out the lxml.
What do you think about that?
I know it's a hugh amount of work, but I'm willing to help with the refactoring if you like.
Tres. - -- =================================================================== Tres Seaver +1 540-429-0999 tseaver@palladion.com Palladion Software "Excellence by Design" http://palladion.com -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFIzyPL+gerLs4ltQ4RAr+3AJ4jh/8JPVazel2q9Hpz4ab60olqPgCgsK1B WlNc8FAiGHG/CUAa/pShLUI= =DoFh -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----