12 Oct
2009
12 Oct
'09
6:58 a.m.
* 2009-10-12 08:55, Wichert Akkerman wrote:
Perhaps it is an idea to make zope.component an extension for repoze.zcml? repoze.zcml already exists and works well, and people who want the extra zope magic can keep using zope.component. I suspect that is less work than trying to split up zope.component.
repoze.zcml uses a different ZCML namespace (bfg), so you cannot replace zope.component.zcml with repoze.zcml without changing your code. Fabio