28 Feb
2006
28 Feb
'06
4:24 p.m.
On 2/28/06, Tres Seaver <tseaver@palladion.com> wrote:
I think the other major point is the "door #2" proposal takes pressure off of Zope3: under that regime, Zope3 does not need to grow all the features present in Zope2, which door #1 *does* imply.
I still would like to know wich these missing features are. Unless it's TTW development, which, as mentioned, I think should be viewed as a separate set of packages. Most Zope3 developers do not want or need it. -- Lennart Regebro, Nuxeo http://www.nuxeo.com/ CPS Content Management http://www.cps-project.org/