29 Nov
2007
29 Nov
'07
1:01 a.m.
On Wed, 28 Nov 2007 11:45:10 -0800, Malthe Borch <mborch@gmail.com> wrote:
-1 to magic or weak dependencies. +1 to "test what you fly and fly what you test"
I agree. In this case it would make sense to have five.jbot. If everyone's in favor, I can split it out like that. It's an interesting situation though because the package in question does not have any code that depends on zope 2 in any way.
While we're on a renaming spree here, why "jbot"? (I know, Just a Bunch of Templates) My associations go to IRC or spam bots immediately. :) -- Alexander Limi ยท http://limi.net