-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Lennart Regebro wrote:
On Thu, Apr 22, 2010 at 09:24, Adam GROSZER <agroszer@gmail.com> wrote:
Hello Tres,
You think we have a chance to get rid of old cruft? Like 5 years old nothing happened since then bugs. I think we should add a tag "too old", add a note to warn subscribers, then set a status "Won't fix" after a month.
There is a state "not enough information" or something like that, and we can close bugs that has been in that state for a period of time. If the bug can be reproduced, it should not be closed just because it's old, even if it's 8 years old.
"Incomplete" is the auto-expiring state: if nobody responds in 30 days, it automatically disappears. I agree that we should at least attempt to reproduce even really old bugs before assigning them 'wontfix' status (if we can't) or 'incomplete' (if we need more information). Tres. - -- =================================================================== Tres Seaver +1 540-429-0999 tseaver@palladion.com Palladion Software "Excellence by Design" http://palladion.com -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iEYEARECAAYFAkvQQvMACgkQ+gerLs4ltQ5akQCguLU/iVzTBp7FKb8u4zLcUyYY UiQAmgMOQKMasmg83GRG0JBdvZBtiu7H =z1bO -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----