Previously Rocky Burt wrote:
On Mon, 2007-05-02 at 12:26 +0100, Philipp von Weitershausen wrote:
On 5 Feb 2007, at 12:22 , Martijn Faassen wrote:
Another is of course who is doing the hosting. Currently we're using ZC's infrastructure for SVN. We need to shift it away from ZC's infrastructure at some point to make it easier to give other people access. ZC can say more about this, however.
I'm sure we'd find somebody willing to host at least the subversion repository. We just need to get to a point where we can say: Hey, the ZF now owns Zope, who wants to host it?
I would highly recommend we move to some sort of neutral OSS service that hosts projects like this (ie sf.net). I know plone is evaluating using some of the services at code.google.com (but I don't believe SVN is one of them although I could be mistaken).
Plone will use svn at google for backup and load distribution purposes: svn.plone.org is going to be synced realtime to both google and another plone.org server, both of which are accessible read-only by anyone. We are also considering storing releases on code.google.com. You can see the current Plone egg and some plone.* packages there already as a test. Wichert. -- Wichert Akkerman <wichert@wiggy.net> It is simple to make things. http://www.wiggy.net/ It is hard to make things simple.