Martijn Faassen wrote:
Hi there,
On Wed, Apr 23, 2008 at 12:58 PM, Christian Theune <ct@gocept.com> wrote: [buildout.org versus buildout.zope.org]
Agreed, we shouldn't hide ourselves. I think *.python.org is a step too far. What I do think is that it's good to let projects that *do* stand on their own stand alone in their presentation as well. That's not about hiding ourselves, it's about giving the right impression to people.
True. Considering that the current zope.org effort hopefully won't die (when are we going to go live? Is there something like a check list or road map?)
I'm not in charge of the zope.org project, but this is a good question. I've cc-ed Martin.
As soon as we have content to cover at least the basics of each of our major projects (Zope 2, Zope 3, CMF, ZODB... and maybe zc.buildout)? Martin -- Author of `Professional Plone Development`, a book for developers who want to work with Plone. See http://martinaspeli.net/plone-book