25 Feb
2009
25 Feb
'09
7:46 a.m.
On Wed, Feb 25, 2009 at 12:39 PM, Lennart Regebro <regebro@gmail.com> wrote:
On Wed, Feb 25, 2009 at 04:05, Shane Hathaway <shane@hathawaymix.org> wrote:
Stephan Richter wrote:
On Tuesday 24 February 2009, Shane Hathaway wrote:
Brainstorming deeper: we could apply a naming convention where the specification package is named with the suffix "spec", so zope.location would be split into zope.location and zope.locationspec.
what about zope.ilocation?
Maybe. I'd lean toward "zope.locationspec" because it would appear right after zope.location in a sorted list, making it more apparent that they are related.
zope.location.interfaces?
This will not make any change in dependency graph unless zope.location become a namespace package. -- Baiju M