27 Mar
2012
27 Mar
'12
2:04 p.m.
On Tue, Mar 27, 2012 at 6:36 AM, Charlie Clark <charlie.clark@clark-consulting.eu> wrote:
True but I think that the problem was largely of our own making in not coming up with "one, preferably only one" way of handling this. Re-reading Marius' post I was struck by the whole idea of the http-server transcoding the content on the fly.
Transcoding on the fly? The page template generates Unicode; that's then encoded. Are you suggesting we shouldn't be using Unicode as the internal representation? Failure to do so would make it easy to get things wrong. -Fred -- Fred L. Drake, Jr. <fred at fdrake.net> "A storm broke loose in my mind." --Albert Einstein