On Thursday 19 January 2006 07:00, Jim Fulton wrote:
I have seen you take a similar approach to zope.testing and I found that painful just by watching the checkins.
I don't understand what you mean. Having a separate zope.testing project has been extremely useful. For example, in our comercial apps, we often used newer versions than existed in Zope 3. We often needed enhacements to zope.testing at times that Zope 3 was feature frozen. We could have made a Zope 3 branch just to modify zope.testing, but that would have been a hassle for us and for Zope 3 developers. Note that the new test runner (from zope.testing) was used in ZODB long before it was used in Zope 3.
Argument taken and agreed that this is a valuable use case. Regard, Stephan -- Stephan Richter CBU Physics & Chemistry (B.S.) / Tufts Physics (Ph.D. student) Web2k - Web Software Design, Development and Training