zope-tests - FAILED: 5, OK: 37, UNKNOWN: 1
This is the summary for test reports received on the zope-tests list between 2012-05-20 00:00:00 UTC and 2012-05-21 00:00:00 UTC: See the footnotes for test reports of unsuccessful builds. An up-to date view of the builders is also available in our buildbot documentation: http://docs.zope.org/zopetoolkit/process/buildbots.html#the-nightly-builds Reports received ---------------- Bluebream / Python2.5.5 64bit linux Bluebream / Python2.6.7 64bit linux Bluebream / Python2.7.2 64bit linux [1] FAILED (errors=1) : Zope-trunk-alltests Python-2.6.6 : Linux ZTK 1.0 / Python2.4.6 Linux 64bit ZTK 1.0 / Python2.5.5 Linux 64bit ZTK 1.0 / Python2.6.7 Linux 64bit [2] ZTK 1.0dev / Python2.4.6 Linux 64bit [3] ZTK 1.0dev / Python2.5.5 Linux 64bit [4] ZTK 1.0dev / Python2.6.7 Linux 64bit ZTK 1.1 / Python2.5.5 Linux 64bit ZTK 1.1 / Python2.6.7 Linux 64bit ZTK 1.1 / Python2.7.2 Linux 64bit ZTK 1.1dev / Python2.5.5 Linux 64bit ZTK 1.1dev / Python2.6.7 Linux 64bit ZTK 1.1dev / Python2.7.2 Linux 64bit Zope 3.4 KGS / Python2.4.6 64bit linux Zope 3.4 KGS / Python2.5.5 64bit linux Zope 3.4 Known Good Set / py2.4-32bit-linux Zope 3.4 Known Good Set / py2.4-64bit-linux Zope 3.4 Known Good Set / py2.5-32bit-linux Zope 3.4 Known Good Set / py2.5-64bit-linux Zope-2.10 Python-2.4.6 : Linux Zope-2.11 Python-2.4.6 : Linux Zope-2.12 Python-2.6.6 : Linux Zope-2.12-alltests Python-2.6.6 : Linux Zope-2.13 Python-2.6.6 : Linux Zope-2.13-alltests Python-2.6.6 : Linux Zope-trunk Python-2.6.6 : Linux winbot / ZODB_dev py_265_win32 winbot / ZODB_dev py_265_win64 winbot / ZODB_dev py_270_win32 winbot / ZODB_dev py_270_win64 [5] winbot / zope.app.appsetup_py_265_32 [6] winbot / zope.configuration_py_265_32 winbot / ztk_10 py_254_win32 winbot / ztk_10 py_265_win32 winbot / ztk_10 py_265_win64 winbot / ztk_11 py_254_win32 winbot / ztk_11 py_265_win32 winbot / ztk_11 py_265_win64 winbot / ztk_11 py_270_win32 winbot / ztk_11 py_270_win64 Non-OK results -------------- [1] UNKNOWN FAILED (errors=1) : Zope-trunk-alltests Python-2.6.6 : Linux https://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2012-May/063362.html [2] FAILED ZTK 1.0dev / Python2.4.6 Linux 64bit https://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2012-May/063350.html [3] FAILED ZTK 1.0dev / Python2.5.5 Linux 64bit https://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2012-May/063352.html [4] FAILED ZTK 1.0dev / Python2.6.7 Linux 64bit https://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2012-May/063351.html [5] FAILED winbot / zope.app.appsetup_py_265_32 https://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2012-May/063340.html [6] FAILED winbot / zope.configuration_py_265_32 https://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2012-May/063339.html
On Tue, May 22, 2012 at 3:00 AM, Zope tests summarizer <noreply@zope.org> wrote:
[1] UNKNOWN FAILED (errors=1) : Zope-trunk-alltests Python-2.6.6 : Linux https://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2012-May/063362.html
Bug in test code, looks like a refactoring went bad. Error in test test_EnsureProtectedDecoCall (AccessControl.tests.testClassSecurityInfo.ClassSecurityInfoTests) Traceback (most recent call last): File "/usr/local/python2.6/lib/python2.6/unittest.py", line 279, in run testMethod() File "/home/stefan/autotest/temp/python26-zope214all/eggs/AccessControl-3.0-py2.6-linux-x86_64.egg/AccessControl/tests/testClassSecurityInfo.py", line 131, in test_EnsureProtectedDecoCall with self.assertRaisesRegexp(AssertionError, 'has 2 non-decorator'): AttributeError: 'ClassSecurityInfoTests' object has no attribute 'assertRaisesRegexp'
[2] FAILED ZTK 1.0dev / Python2.4.6 Linux 64bit https://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2012-May/063350.html
[3] FAILED ZTK 1.0dev / Python2.5.5 Linux 64bit https://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2012-May/063352.html
[4] FAILED ZTK 1.0dev / Python2.6.7 Linux 64bit https://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2012-May/063351.html
zope.app.twisted does not depend on twisted and does not have it as a dependency.
[5] FAILED winbot / zope.app.appsetup_py_265_32 https://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2012-May/063340.html
Same error as last time. Does it make sense to test zope.app.appsetup? ztk does not depend on it it is not part of zopeapp.cfg of ztk 1.1 Grok from 1.3 onward does not use it. Bluebream... Well, bluebream uses zopeapp 1.0, but its last release is also nearly 1.5 years ago. There seems to be a successor(?) named ztfy, which uses ztk 1.1 so is also not dependent on zope.app.appsetup. But I am not sure for how long already. Well, the question is, is there still a need for ztk 1.0 tests? If so, who are the consumers and for how long should we run the tests for 1.0? If anybody replies, please adjust the topic. I guess many people ignore the summarizer thread.
[6] FAILED winbot / zope.configuration_py_265_32 https://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2012-May/063339.html
Tres, could it be that this is related to the merge you did?
On 05/22/2012 04:32 AM, Patrick Gerken wrote:
[2] FAILED ZTK 1.0dev / Python2.4.6 Linux 64bit https://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2012-May/063350.html
[3] FAILED ZTK 1.0dev / Python2.5.5 Linux 64bit https://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2012-May/063352.html
[4] FAILED ZTK 1.0dev / Python2.6.7 Linux 64bit https://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2012-May/063351.html
zope.app.twisted does not depend on twisted and does not have it as a dependency.
I made a stab at fixing it, but couldn't figure out which version of Twisted was compatible (none of the more recent versions work). I have no idea why tests passed before I copied the release branch.
[5] FAILED winbot / zope.app.appsetup_py_265_32 https://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2012-May/063340.html
Same error as last time. Does it make sense to test zope.app.appsetup? ztk does not depend on it it is not part of zopeapp.cfg of ztk 1.1 Grok from 1.3 onward does not use it. Bluebream... Well, bluebream uses zopeapp 1.0, but its last release is also nearly 1.5 years ago. There seems to be a successor(?) named ztfy, which uses ztk 1.1 so is also not dependent on zope.app.appsetup. But I am not sure for how long already.
Well, the question is, is there still a need for ztk 1.0 tests? If so, who are the consumers and for how long should we run the tests for 1.0? If anybody replies, please adjust the topic. I guess many people ignore the summarizer thread.
I think we can safely stop testing the deprecated pacakgaes individually.
[6] FAILED winbot / zope.configuration_py_265_32 https://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2012-May/063339.html
Tres, could it be that this is related to the merge you did?
This is a Windows-only failure which I have tried several times to whack. Tres. -- =================================================================== Tres Seaver +1 540-429-0999 tseaver@palladion.com Palladion Software "Excellence by Design" http://palladion.com
On Tue, May 22, 2012 at 7:44 PM, Tres Seaver <tseaver@palladion.com> wrote:
On 05/22/2012 04:32 AM, Patrick Gerken wrote:
[2] FAILED ZTK 1.0dev / Python2.4.6 Linux 64bit https://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2012-May/063350.html
[3] FAILED ZTK 1.0dev / Python2.5.5 Linux 64bit https://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2012-May/063352.html
[4] FAILED ZTK 1.0dev / Python2.6.7 Linux 64bit https://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2012-May/063351.html
zope.app.twisted does not depend on twisted and does not have it as a dependency.
I made a stab at fixing it, but couldn't figure out which version of Twisted was compatible (none of the more recent versions work). I have no idea why tests passed before I copied the release branch.
[5] FAILED winbot / zope.app.appsetup_py_265_32 https://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2012-May/063340.html
Same error as last time. Does it make sense to test zope.app.appsetup? ztk does not depend on it it is not part of zopeapp.cfg of ztk 1.1 Grok from 1.3 onward does not use it. Bluebream... Well, bluebream uses zopeapp 1.0, but its last release is also nearly 1.5 years ago. There seems to be a successor(?) named ztfy, which uses ztk 1.1 so is also not dependent on zope.app.appsetup. But I am not sure for how long already.
Well, the question is, is there still a need for ztk 1.0 tests? If so, who are the consumers and for how long should we run the tests for 1.0? If anybody replies, please adjust the topic. I guess many people ignore the summarizer thread.
I think we can safely stop testing the deprecated pacakgaes individually.
Unfortunately somehow Plone still depends on it.
[6] FAILED winbot / zope.configuration_py_265_32 https://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2012-May/063339.html
Tres, could it be that this is related to the merge you did?
This is a Windows-only failure which I have tried several times to whack.
I THINK I fixed it. The commit message explains the failure if anybody wants to know. http://zope3.pov.lt/trac/changeset/126448
On 05/22/2012 04:53 PM, Patrick Gerken wrote:
On Tue, May 22, 2012 at 7:44 PM, Tres Seaver <tseaver@palladion.com> wrote:
I think we can safely stop testing the deprecated pacakgaes individually.
Unfortunately somehow Plone still depends on it.
zope.app.appsetup gets tested as part of the ZTK 1.0 full-suite tests, both released and dev. I'm just suggesting we can drop the individual test (test the dev version against released versions of dependencies), as I don't believe there is any real development happening.
[6] FAILED winbot / zope.configuration_py_265_32 https://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2012-May/063339.html
Tres, could it be that this is related to the merge you did?
This is a Windows-only failure which I have tried several times to whack.
Great work, thanks! Tres. -- =================================================================== Tres Seaver +1 540-429-0999 tseaver@palladion.com Palladion Software "Excellence by Design" http://palladion.com
participants (3)
-
Patrick Gerken -
Tres Seaver -
Zope tests summarizer