2 Mar
2000
2 Mar
'00
7:07 a.m.
A very meek greeting.. Ok... i have now seen the error of my ways. I fully admit i was not aware there were so many problems to what seemed like such a simple convenience. I'm sure i can live with trying to remember to set the To address. Please, _I_ require no further conviction in this matter. The information has been provided as i asked (thanks to all who did), and I have been made suitably aware of why this (and many other) list avoids using the reply-to field, for the simple matter of 'avoiding problems'. Hey.. by the way... has anyone else noticed the prolific nature of vagueness in RFCs? -- Have a better one, Curtis. <dtml-var standard_work_disclaimer>