I would like to ask that people developing patches to Zope that use the same method as ZC Hotfixes _NOT_ call them Hotfixes. It is confusing and misleading, and is causing a bit of a stir around here. Hotfixes should be reserved to ZC fixes to Zope security issues. This is the origin of the use in Zope, and many have already associated a Zope Hotfix with a security fix. Additionally, to those who review announcements/products on Zope.org for publication, could you _please_ not approve those that call themselves Hotfixes, unless of course they come from ZC? I have had a number of people come to me and ask just what security problem there is with Image tags, as a result of the recent Imagetag 'hotfix' announcement on zope.org. It is very important for the distinctin to be made. Consider the new reporter, who has seen ZC/DC issue security fixes, labelling them Hotfixes. Now imagine what happens when they see a list of fifteen, twenty, thirty 'hotfixes', what are they going to assume? Yes, we would hope they would do some research, though we _know_ that in many cases they will not. Next thing you know, Zope has twenty or thirty security exploits you need to fix. We do not need this. Anyway, just thought I would relay that. When I tell people these are not issues, I then get questioned as to why they are labelled as Hotfixes. Unfortunately, I do not have kind words with respect to the announcement/author's naming choice to reply to that with. The-road-to-a-bad-reputation-is-paved-with-mislabelled-hotfixes-ly y'rs Bill Anderson