2 Nov
2009
2 Nov
'09
5:23 a.m.
What kind of practical sense does it make to batch 400k objects? I can no imagine single usecase where one would be interested in walking through such an amount of objects manually. Better organize your data in a more handy way or implement some search logic for bringing the batch size to a number of relevant object.s -aj On Mon, Nov 2, 2009 at 00:04, Ken Ara <feedreader@yahoo.com> wrote:
Under our setup, beyond 300-400,000 contained objects, the batching provided by getBatchObjectListing becomes unusable. I've seen this problem mentioned somewhere but never any hint of a solution.