On Mon, Nov 28, 2005 at 04:09:31PM +0100, Andreas Jung wrote:
--On 28. November 2005 15:52:25 +0100 Gerhard Schmidt <estartu@ze.tum.de> wrote:
Sure I object. Why should perfectly working code be removed. There is no alternativ for heavy loaded sites which need integration of apache and zope. mod_proxy is no alternativ because it raises the load even further.
I've seen lots of heavy loaded Zope sites - I've not seen a single one using FastCGI. Can you give us some number about the FastCGI performance compared to the standard mod_rewrite approach? Let numbers speak....
I don't have exakt numbers. We started with pcgi and had heavy problems under load. They disapeared with the fastCGI module coming wird zope 2.6 i gues. I ve tried mod_proxy back than but had many problems. I can not test on the Production system as there are 40000 users on the system and we have enougth Problems with Readconflictes and Session problems.
But please read carefully...I wrote about deprecating the module but not about removing it as in my original posting. We want o make clear that FCGI is not supported.
Yes but if its deprecated it can disapear from any new version. And thats an situation i'm not very comfortable with.
You are of course free to use it as long as you need.
I know. I will read me in the FCGIServer and see if I can understand how its work. But my time is Limited. (Running and developing a portal for i 40000 user with 3 Fulltime workers isn't that easy). Bye Estartu ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Gerhard Schmidt | Nick : estartu IRC : Estartu | Fischbachweg 3 | | PGP Public Key 86856 Hiltenfingen | EMail: estartu@augusta.de | on request Germany | |