Hi Garth. Yes, it is very compact compared to XUF for sure. Thank you for this feedback. I will be evaluating this option as well. There are differences in licensing that may be a factor in what I decide to use after some evaluation. BSD with XUF compared to MIT with SimpleUserFolder. I have tended to stick with ZPL and BSD only sources. I try to learn from GPL-like sources as opposed to using them in my code. This may be a factor in my decision despite the fact that SimpleUserFolder may be smaller and simpler to implement. Regards, David On Friday, July 15, 2005, at 08:57 PM, Garth B. wrote:
For what it's worth, I recently used the SimpleUserFolder for an application that uses Postgres as the backend. It was terrifically easy to implement authentication through Postgres via the SimpleUserFolder. It does exactly what I want without unnecessary frill or complications.
Garth
On 7/15/05, Dieter Maurer <dieter@handshake.de> wrote:
David Pratt wrote at 2005-7-14 20:30 -0300:
Thanks Dieter. I was really hoping it is a good solution since it is the only User Folder product for Postgres that I have seen thus far.
Chris Withers would tell you, that "Simple User Folder" can do this as well :-)
-- Dieter _______________________________________________ Zope maillist - Zope@zope.org http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope ** No cross posts or HTML encoding! ** (Related lists - http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev )
_______________________________________________ Zope maillist - Zope@zope.org http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope ** No cross posts or HTML encoding! ** (Related lists - http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev )