No. Same end would be achieved with rsync and a cron job. Either one works; I'm just a bit paranoid to use NFS for a software home on a clustered box, unless one was really confident in their NFS server cluster...that's why I thought of Intermezzo, but rsync is likely a good lighter-weight alternative even to that... Sean -----Original Message----- From: Toby Dickenson [mailto:tdickenson@devmail.geminidataloggers.co.uk] Sent: Monday, March 18, 2002 2:37 AM To: sean.upton@uniontrib.com Cc: chrism@zope.com; aschmidt@nv.cc.va.us; zope@zope.org Subject: Re: [Zope] ZEO and LocalFS On Fri, 15 Mar 2002 14:38:45 -0800, sean.upton@uniontrib.com wrote:
In theory, at least on Linux, Intermezzo might be more appropriate for syncing code in the Zope software home. We plan on doing this with our next Zope setup, with the idea that the software homes stay synced when we do a cvs update of the code on our production servers, but they are still independent and local.
Do you see any advantages in using Intermezzo over something more mundane like rsync ? It seems like there would be more to go wrong. Toby Dickenson tdickenson@geminidataloggers.com