I think you missed the point. The main reason to ditch it is the fact that there is no one who is willing and able to support the code for it in Zope. Just because someone comes up with a combination where FCGI might have a benefit still does not give us a developer to support it. jens On 21 Dec 2005, at 04:48, David Bear wrote:
could this be one reason to keep fastcgi?
On 12/19/05, Robert Boyd <robert.h.boyd@gmail.com> wrote: I'm using Apache 2.0, and I cannot find a solution to passing the value of REMOTE_USER from Apache to Zope when using a rewrite rule. I have Apache rewriting requests for Zope, and hooked into Tomcat with mod_jk. My users login through a servlet, and Apache has REMOTE_USER available to it. But any subsequent request to Zope loses this value. I used to have this all working when using FastCGI, but I'm hoping to use only mod_rewrite. Is it possible?
Thanks, Rob
_______________________________________________ Zope maillist - Zope@zope.org http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope ** No cross posts or HTML encoding! ** (Related lists - http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev )
-- David Bear What's the difference between private knowledge and public knowledge? _______________________________________________ Zope maillist - Zope@zope.org http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope ** No cross posts or HTML encoding! ** (Related lists - http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev )