On Wed, 07 Dec 2005 01:39:37 -0800, Chris Withers <chris@simplistix.co.uk> wrote:
Dieter Maurer wrote:
The original poster explained his wish to retain FCGI: It reuses an existing connection between Apache and Zope while (he thinks and I might believe it) the recommended "mod_proxy" way each time opens a new connection. Thus, FastCGI might be more efficient.
Show me some evidence proving that fcgi or mod_proxy is the significant limiting performance factor in a setup involving zope and I'll take this seriously ;-)
FWIW, we did some rudimentary benchmarking with Zope + Apache using mod_proxy vs. Zope + FastCGI + lighttpd (a very fast and lightweight web server). There was no difference in performance since Zope is so slow in the first place - so it didn't make any difference. -- _____________________________________________________________________ Alexander Limi · Chief Architect · Plone Solutions · Norway Consulting · Training · Development · http://www.plonesolutions.com _____________________________________________________________________ Plone Co-Founder · http://plone.org · Connecting Content Plone Foundation · http://plone.org/foundation · Protecting Plone