-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Well, acutally secureness in this case has not really something to do with protection against attackers. It's more secureness in the sense of consistency and data security. The system has to be determined in every way and every step must be reversible and traceable. That is possible with PHP based solutions. But PHP is not necessarily what I meant ;) Regards, Sven Tino Wildenhain schrieb:
Sven Deichmann schrieb:
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1
Oh well... no news is not always good news. I could also mean that PHP is much more popular and under more surveillance while python is only good known to professional crackers...
The problem is, that in this usecase we won't be able to use Zope if there is no official, independent security certificate for it.
While I wonder who could prossibly proofe PHP or PHP based solutions secure in the meaning of secureness in Zope. ;)
Regards Tino
- -- - --------------------------------------------------------------- Information nimmt Gestalt an... - <http://www.werkbank.com> - --------------------------------------------------------------- Werkbank Multimedia GmbH * Bergstrasse 152 * 44791 Bochum * GER Fon: +49(0)234/ 935386-03 * Fax: 935386-06 * mail@werkbank.com - --------------------------------------------------------------- -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (Darwin) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iEYEARECAAYFAkPZ59YACgkQx3fK1szFYvlj6ACfV2b+dKtKHZ1jI8RgXgbULSDs d4AAn06hzp1IM/I+n6blAJW5sDa0ybEs =t1El -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----