That has been my impression although the upgrades seem to have touched everything... I'm about to have to commit to a base release for production and am still debating whether to use RH7.3 or RH9. Can you describe some of the other problems you've had with RH9. I'm running it here on a desktop with few problems, but it's undemanding as environments go. On Sun, 20 Jul 2003, Andreas Jung wrote:
i just installed python using "configure;make" without any special environment hacks. i works perfectly but in general i think rh9 is a very bad release since there are tons of other problems (not releated to Zope/Python).
-aj
--On Sonntag, 20. Juli 2003 13:44 Uhr -0700 Dennis Allison <allison@sumeru.stanford.EDU> wrote:
Are you using the old or the new verision of threads? Did you need to resort to the
LD_ASSUME_KERNEL=2.4.1
hack?
On Sun, 20 Jul 2003, Andreas Jung wrote:
--On Sonntag, 20. Juli 2003 13:16 Uhr -0700 Dennis Allison <allison@sumeru.stanford.EDU> wrote:
Anyone running production on the RH9 system with all the available upgrades and patches? I know there have been problems but rumour has it that it is now stable and playing well with Zope. Can anyone confirm from their direct experience?
i runs fine as long as you compile python and zope on your own.
-aj
_______________________________________________ Zope maillist - Zope@zope.org http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope ** No cross posts or HTML encoding! ** (Related lists - http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev )
_______________________________________________ Zope maillist - Zope@zope.org http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope ** No cross posts or HTML encoding! ** (Related lists - http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev )