I wrote: [a request to help test my survey product] Thanks, all. The comments in particular were most helpful. I'll get someone with color sense to look at it soon. The tree-tag experiment failed, but I think if we go to a one-stage hierarchy rather than two-stage, things should work out OK. Unless, of course, we find a new, magical way to get people to choose among 340 choices. Would you believe in my travels I did not know you could wrap text in a <textarea>? Now I know. Apparently a few individuals got ZopeErrors when cookies were not enabled. I suppose I should let people know first about the cookie requirement. On the upside, it did not crash, it apparently loaded pretty quickly, and there were a couple of instances where multiple users were responding at the same time, without noticeable drag on the machine. Quick and easy statistics for the curious: Browsers: Internet Explorer 4 3 Internet Explorer 5 19 Netscape 4 23 Netscape 6 or Mozilla 3 Other: 5 legibility a (OK) 35 b (Bad) 1 c (pretty good) 19 I note that those that marked "c" were using IE5+. CSS a (go back to tables) 28 b (everyone *should* have a css browser) 26 I'm still working on the code to get the list of what everyone wanted to be when they grew up (it was the custom tree-tag question), so I do not have that now. Thanks again, -- Jim