I was wondering if I could get some feedback on DirectoryStorage as compared to FilesystemStorage, which ships with the default Zope product. From what I've read on the website (http://dirstorage.sourceforge.net/), it claims to be a much more robust and fault tolerant way of storing data compared to FilesystemStorage (Data.fs). I hadn't given DirectoryStorage much thought until I saw that Enfold Systems (http://www.enfoldsystems.com/Products/Server/Features) released their Enfold Enterprise Server as default using DirectoryStorage as opposed to FilesystemStorage. Based on this, I wanted to get some feedback from the Zope community about this storage option, it's scalability, it's use in a high volume production setting, it's stability, scalability, robustness, etc. And if the Enfold Systems people are reading this, I'd be interested in their reasons behind their decision to go this route as I'm sure some thought was put into why to go this way as opposed to what ships default with Zope. Our group will be going into production with 2-3 Zope/Plone sites in the very near future and robustness, security, and scalability are key factors in our production environment. What are the community's thoughts on DirectoryStorage as compared to FilesystemStorage? Thanks in advance, Shane -- http://liquid.homelinux.org/