25 Sep
1999
25 Sep
'99
8:54 a.m.
Bill Anderson wrote:
In my mind, being 'good' at html is a huge waste of human material, especially if it comes at the expense of creativity. Only a few people are expected to be 'good' at postscript, the rest is all automated. It is a sad reflection on the backward nature of the web that being 'good' at html is seen as desireable.
If bad html results in page being twice or more the size of the same page with good html, I'll take good any day.
But the designer who is 'good' at design (and 'not good' at html) usually has also a good connection and good computer, so he never notices the slowness. It's only the sucker at the end of modem line (or other end of world) who sees the slowness. ------- Hannu